Let Me In
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Numbers Of Gays In Bombay
 | |
Synopsis: Owen, a 12 year old boy abused by his classmates and dreams of revenge power, Abby soon meets a girl (apparently) the same age with the onset of friendship ... Not knowing that she is a vampire.
Initial Impression: Wonderful as wonderful as the original film
Script and Development: I knew when I finally could see me this movie my review would prove to be a long compared to Let The Right One In so let's begin.
Despite the statement made by Reeves, his screenplay was not a remake of the film but another adaptation of the novel, the SI is a remake of the film, and a very faithful in that respect almost all development but adapting well the eighties Americans (the film is set in New Mexico, 1983) but the really interesting is that not an adaptation "takes by making ", nor a version of" dumbed for gringos to understand "because in reality there is nothing wrong here, nothing to do an angry scream," That was not so in the original! "because the changes are real improvements on this.
For example, in Let The Right One In I did not like at all the sub-plot of the adults who were victims of Eli, while here it takes away ownership and their stories are much better connected with Owen, which makes development much more fluid. Remember the guardian of Eli and Oskar as teorizábamos that was going to happen as well? Although the book is not so in this film is quite clear where things are (not scream at the screen), the other radical change in the character of Owen, here is a psychopath in power (despite an opening scene that seems to suggest), their reactions to what happens around them are more humane and has more details in his personality that make it more credible (and their fondness for sweets or voyeuristic tendencies.) Also remove the scene that actually proves SPOILER OF THE ORIGINAL She is a child vampire vampire gelding END SPOILER , a factor which, although essential in the book, the film actually provides no nothing except make Eli more intriguing.
But it is Let Me In better than its European predecessor? I dare not say so, certainly no worse and is at its height. I think in many ways better ... but ... no, it's hard for me to articulate in words, but it is very, very possible that is.
management and technical aspects: since I saw my beloved Cloverfield Matt Reeves knew he had talent, but did not know that much. Let Me In is beautifully directed, work lighting is great (I love the idea of \u200b\u200busing warm colors and cold at night in the day) and the atmosphere is very similar to the original film. Although the scene the pool is not as colorful as the original, it notes that Matt did not want to repeat what we saw and wanted to do something new, and it went well, anyway, for art scenes we had the car accident an hour earlier.
There is more gore in this version (though still not much), and is very well done, but if it deteriorates a little music, which is quite mellow. Although we no longer have the horrible scene of cats, if there are other times that clash too CGI.
Actions: Spectacular, Owen and Abby do not have anything to envy Oskar and Eli. And not only that the secondary performances are better in this version.
Reflections: This is a wonderful film, a work of art that honestly deserves to be placed on the same list as other wonders of horror The Shining or The Exorcist and is a real injustice that has failed at the box office ... but that does not diminish their biggest problem, is an unnecessary disgusting film, this story had been told in a lecture by a European director, simply because they could not release it commercially in the U.S.? can not even say that "adapted to the American public," because it is just as smart and subtle.
Initial Impression: Wonderful as wonderful as the original film
Script and Development: I knew when I finally could see me this movie my review would prove to be a long compared to Let The Right One In so let's begin.
Despite the statement made by Reeves, his screenplay was not a remake of the film but another adaptation of the novel, the SI is a remake of the film, and a very faithful in that respect almost all development but adapting well the eighties Americans (the film is set in New Mexico, 1983) but the really interesting is that not an adaptation "takes by making ", nor a version of" dumbed for gringos to understand "because in reality there is nothing wrong here, nothing to do an angry scream," That was not so in the original! "because the changes are real improvements on this.
For example, in Let The Right One In I did not like at all the sub-plot of the adults who were victims of Eli, while here it takes away ownership and their stories are much better connected with Owen, which makes development much more fluid. Remember the guardian of Eli and Oskar as teorizábamos that was going to happen as well? Although the book is not so in this film is quite clear where things are (not scream at the screen), the other radical change in the character of Owen, here is a psychopath in power (despite an opening scene that seems to suggest), their reactions to what happens around them are more humane and has more details in his personality that make it more credible (and their fondness for sweets or voyeuristic tendencies.) Also remove the scene that actually proves SPOILER OF THE ORIGINAL She is a child vampire vampire gelding END SPOILER , a factor which, although essential in the book, the film actually provides no nothing except make Eli more intriguing.
But it is Let Me In better than its European predecessor? I dare not say so, certainly no worse and is at its height. I think in many ways better ... but ... no, it's hard for me to articulate in words, but it is very, very possible that is.
management and technical aspects: since I saw my beloved Cloverfield Matt Reeves knew he had talent, but did not know that much. Let Me In is beautifully directed, work lighting is great (I love the idea of \u200b\u200busing warm colors and cold at night in the day) and the atmosphere is very similar to the original film. Although the scene the pool is not as colorful as the original, it notes that Matt did not want to repeat what we saw and wanted to do something new, and it went well, anyway, for art scenes we had the car accident an hour earlier.
There is more gore in this version (though still not much), and is very well done, but if it deteriorates a little music, which is quite mellow. Although we no longer have the horrible scene of cats, if there are other times that clash too CGI.
Actions: Spectacular, Owen and Abby do not have anything to envy Oskar and Eli. And not only that the secondary performances are better in this version.
Reflections: This is a wonderful film, a work of art that honestly deserves to be placed on the same list as other wonders of horror The Shining or The Exorcist and is a real injustice that has failed at the box office ... but that does not diminish their biggest problem, is an unnecessary disgusting film, this story had been told in a lecture by a European director, simply because they could not release it commercially in the U.S.? can not even say that "adapted to the American public," because it is just as smart and subtle.
- Good: is a work of art.
- Bad: is a work of art we had seen.
- Ugly: As always, the CGI.
What
RATING: 9 / 10
Return to Horror Film Colombia
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment